The table below shows the number of female prisoners by race and age in 2015

Essay topics:

The table below shows the number of female prisoners by race and age in 2015

The table compares four different races in terms of the quantity of female inmates in different age ranges in the year 2015.

Overall, what stands out from the table is that whilst the total of Black female prisoners was the highest, the reverse was true for the White ones. Another noteworthy point is there was a consistent trend in the number of convicts through age groups.

A closer look at the table reveals that in the age under 17, the number of Black female prisoners ranked first, accounting for 142 inmates which tripled the White's quantity. The female inmates' populations witnessed a remarkable increase in the 18-19 age bracket, just under 20 for the White which was one-third the Black before shooting up to 164 and 426 for the White and Black thirtysomething prisoners. The number of Black and White females who were imprisoned collapsed by 100 prisoners at the age of 40 - 44 (360 and 131 prisoners) and have a downward trend when compared to the older groups, reaching the trough of 6 Black detainees and 2 White detainees at the over-65s group.

There was a steady decline in the number of Asian and Hispanic women detainees between the 13-17-year-olds and the 18-19-year-old from 67 to 23 Asian prisoners which was approximately the Hispanic inmates. After rising dramatically to 172 Asians and 171 Hispanics in the 40-44 age band, the population of female inmates slumped and touched the lowest point around 4 prisoners at the over 65 age group.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-05 Trần Ánh Vy 67 view
2024-11-30 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-11-26 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-11-26 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-11-26 Trần Ánh Vy view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.888 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70379125214 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3243319227 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.75 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.25 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294841916511 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14405528484 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685525885686 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193039792345 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483056228812 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.