The given table chart demonstrates the ratio of medals, which have been won by the top ten nations in London during the 2012 Olympic games.
Starting with gold medals, it can be clearly observed that the united states, china, Great Britain, and Russia won the maximum medals that were higher than other nations. Turning to silver medals, the USA, China, and Russia had the highest number of medals, Which accounted for 29, 27, and 26 respectively, whilst the rest of the countries were least in terms of winning medals.
Moving further to Bronze, it is interesting to note that the American and Russian participants won more medals that were more than 25 medals in the comparison of other countries. Finally, talking about total medals, America, China, and Russia took the top positions for winning medals than other competitive nations.
Overall, the USA was at the top for winning medals, whereas Hungary was at 10th position in the Olympic games during 2012.
- Intelligence is the most important component of leadership Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and support it with adequate examples 61
- Some people think that uniform at school is unnecessary and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and examples from your own experience 78
- Writing task 2 (an essay)Some people believe that radio is the best way to get news while others think that TV is better for this purpose. Discuss both views, give your opinion and relevant examples. 61
- » You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 67
- The bar chart shows the number of overseas students enrolled in a third year Computer Science course at a Canadian college.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, whereas, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00621118012 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36524479341 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9793988129 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245734042491 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123755645884 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106564712047 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161939775506 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114592601212 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.