the table below shows the number of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006

Essay topics:

the table below shows the number of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006

The tabular data depicts how many people worked in 4 certain divisions in the UK in 1998 and 2006.

First of all, in 1998, the major proportion of young people (over 100,000) preferred to work in building sector which kept on decreasing with age. The figures for this sector had fewer workers overall in 2006 though it retained a similar age profile to that of 1998. Similarly, in hotel and catering, the age of workers used to be much younger in 1998, with the majority of workers being under 35. In 2006, the majority of people were between 26 and 45, with more workers in the over-46 category ( four thousand more in each category) than in 1998 and fewer in under 25s.

Whereas the other 2 workplaces had either a fluctuating or an increasing trend. Amongst them, the technology industry has seen an enormous change with substantially more workers now than in 1998, but the vast majority of these were still in the 26-35 age band which were under 65,000 and around 450,000 respectively). The numbers in education have not changed that much within each age category, although there are now fewer workers in the over-56 age group with a difference of over 20,000 which became half.

Overall, it can be seen that hotel and catering as well as building had dropped in the later ages and also in 2006. Whereas middle-aged people were preferring to work in technology and education field with the overall highest figure seen for technology for the 26-35 age group.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-03-07 gtuez 84 view
2020-03-30 Jocelyn 73 view
2020-03-30 Jocelyn 79 view
2019-03-17 Fenny Mahara 78 view
2018-09-29 Dhruv_gre 79 view
Essays by user Jocelyn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proportion of young people over 100,000 preferred to work in building sector whi...
^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith more workers in the over-46 category four thousand more in each category than...
^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...lso in 2006. Whereas middle-aged people were preferring to work in technology and education fie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, still, well, whereas, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74509803922 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41380751999 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3762323773 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288375500497 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124671141317 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808915830348 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199028904981 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717793242292 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.