The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualifications in 2007/8 and 2008/9, and the proportion of male qualifiers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and

Essay topics:

The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualifications in 2007/8 and 2008/9, and the proportion of male qualifiers.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The report summarises information about the total students in United Kingdom aquiring English language teacher training qualifications in 2007/8 and 2008/9, and percentage of male qualifiers. Table also includes the number of male and female qualifiers seperately. The Qualifications includes two types, TEFL and Cambridge UCLESCELTA and others.

Proportion of male qualifiers is less than 30% in all instances. TEFL Qualifiers are always higher than others.

Although, there is no high increase in total number of Qualifiers in 2008/9 from 2007/8 , percentage of male fell by 2%. Even though there is a dramatic increase in number of qualifiers through Cambridge UCLES CELTA , percentage of male qualifiers fell drastically.

TEFL qualifiers fell by 500 in 2008/9 compared to 2007/8, henceforth , Percentage of male also dropped slightly.

Overall, male qualifiers are always less for English language teachers compared to females and male qualifiers are going on dropping.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-24 Krushnagopal 56 view
2017-07-11 Thao Anh194 73 view
2017-02-05 Trangnguyen95 78 view
Essays by user Krushnagopal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'include'.
Suggestion: include
...alifiers seperately. The Qualifications includes two types, TEFL and Cambridge UCLESCELT...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mber of Qualifiers in 2008/9 from 2007/8 , percentage of male fell by 2%. Even tho...
^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...qualifiers through Cambridge UCLES CELTA , percentage of male qualifiers fell dras...
^^
Line 11, column 69, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in 2008/9 compared to 2007/8, henceforth , Percentage of male also dropped slightl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82068965517 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03855039974 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544827586207 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2292196564 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7777777778 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264268549486 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12216290064 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121239491725 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153511660388 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117335528178 0.0819641961636 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.18 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.