The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown museum during the year befkre and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the resukt of surveys askong visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table below represents the number of guests visiting the Ashdown museum when it was archaic and after modernizing it. The chart illustrates the outcome of the study taken to report the satisfaction grades by the visitors in the same two periods.
Overall, the total population varied among the two periods where the visitors increased after refurbishing the museum to about 20,000. In general, the positive outcomes of the satisfactory grades elevated after the modernization and in contrast, the negative outcomes declined keeping the no response category of visitors similar in both the periods. There was a vast change in very satisfied and satisfied class of visitors as both of them were increased from 15 and 30 to 35 and 40 respectively. On the other hand, dissatisfied and very dissatisfied guests decreased after remodeling to a scale from 40 and 10 to 15 and 5 respectively. In conclusion, the positive impression after remodeling the museum increased and negative impression was reduced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | wardiati | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-01 | tejaswi0924 | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 73
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The first bar chart descibes the important reasons for study among students of different age while the second chart illustrates the amount of money they were supported by employers. 73
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how the cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table below represents the number of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he visitors in the same two periods. Overall, the total population varied amo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
in conclusion, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03801004517 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540372670807 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4525882261 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242974477369 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112600821757 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600683425292 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221259963737 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659430820678 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.