The table below shows the percentage use of four different fuel types to generate electricity in five Asian countries in 2005
The diagram gives information about the proportion of using Nuclear, Coal and lignite, Petroleum and Hydro and wind fuel types to produce electricity in five countries of Asia in 2005.
Overall, it can be seen from the table that Malaysia was the society which used the Coal and lignite most to generate electricity while the Thailand was the lowest in the usage of Nuclear in 2005.
According to the diagram, the consumption of Coal and lignite was the important fuel type for Malaysia accounted for 61 and Singapore was the second largest land responsible for 42 consuming Coal and lignite to produce electricity. In terms of Nuclear, Japan used the largest amount of Nuclear formed just under 50 while South Korea ranked first (48%) in Hydro and wind.
Meanwhile, Nuclear consumption in Singapore stood 13 %, which witnessed the smallest proportion among the five Asian nations. In terms of Coal and lignite, Thailand consumed the least Coal and lignite comprised 3% and the share on Petroleum products in Malaysia formed 2% of using there, which was the lowest percentage among five communities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | aligarxi90 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-05 | baljit12 | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | santhip123 | 20 | view |
| 2020-09-05 | npoppp2 | 72 | view |
| 2020-09-05 | npoppp2 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003 2012 78
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passangers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passangers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 79
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11049723757 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62170834902 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524861878453 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.1354485516 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.166666667 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20171995778 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106741234594 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771897531989 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142245490809 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744541133192 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.