The table below shows the production of coffee beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 measured in tons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below shows the production of coffee beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 (measured in tons). Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table given provides a comparison of coffee beans production in six different regions from 1992 to 1998.

Overall, it can be seen that Asia and South America were the areas which had the largest number of cacao beans. It is also noticeable that North and Central America was the only area that had production of cacao beans remained unchanged over 6-year period.

Between 1992 and 1998, the coffee beans production in both Asia and Oceania followed the same pattern, which increased from 119,000 to 436,000 tons and from 40,000 to 77,000 tons respectively. Meanwhile, the amount of cacao beans in South America witnessed a fall from 143,000 tons in 1992 to 127,000 tons in 1996 before rising 3 times to 389,000 tons in 1998.

After experiencing a significant growth to 119,000 tons of coffee beans in Africa, the figure then dropped remarkably to 28,000 tons in 1998. In North and Central America, the amount of cacao produced both started and ended at 46,000 tons. Finally, in England, the figures fluctuated around 50,000 tons from 1992 to 1998.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-16 imhongoc_ 73 view
Essays by user imhongoc_ :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9606741573 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41364555979 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1156571204 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210516757373 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114889113849 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107467862508 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16793599538 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120200131265 0.0819641961636 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.