The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics. Describe the information shown below in your own words.
The given table compares 4 countries in terms of 4 public and commercial measures in accordance with United Nations statistics in 1994.
Overall, all the indicators of Japan and Canada were far higher than that of Peru and Zaire. Zaire was the country had all the figures at the lowest level compare to others.
The individual earnings every year in Canada was 11100 dollars, this number was considerably lower than Japan with 15760 dollars. Whereas the calorie uptake per person every day was lower in Japan with 2846 cal than Canada with 3326 cal, the expected lifetime at birth of Japanese was slightly longer than that of Canadian with 78 years old compares with 76 years old, respectively. The mature education ratios, however, were equal at a very high number of 99% in both countries.
In the meantime, the recorded revenue each year per person in Peru was 160 dollars while that of Zaire was 130 dollars. The daily calorie supply per person in Peru was 1927 cal compared to 1749 cal in Zaire. These figures accompanied with the anticipated lifespan of children in 2 countries at 51 and 47 years old, respectively, were remarkably lower than Canada and Japan. Along with this, the proportion of literate adult were only 68% in Peru and 34% in Zaire.
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 73
- The methods used by international students when booking the online English courses in three different countries in 2009 and 2010 46
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84331797235 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46017354346 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552995391705 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5705557766 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0484445202785 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294251846203 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598412732022 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651763801961 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819759401891 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.