The table below summarises some data collected by a college bookshop for the month of February 2004. Write report describing the sales figures of various types of publications, based on the information shown in the table.
The given table compares the quantity of 3 books specifically Fiction, Non-Fiction and Magazines that were sold to Non Book Club Members and Book Club Members in February 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that while Magazines surpassed remaining two books in total, Fiction constituted the bottom of all books.
In detail, regarding the Non Book Club Members, 1249 Magazines were purchased by college students, as opposed to Fiction at 31, which was the lowest net among them. Likewise, Magazines headed the list at 332 among College Staff, whereas Non Fiction was the least popular copy at 29. In t...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-25 | Clark Jones | 83 | view |
- Countries becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 90
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras.) In many cases, the people being monitored are unware that this is happening.Do you think the advanta 76
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 76
- The table below gives information about student enrolment at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answer and in 56
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
not '3 books' but '3 kinds of books'
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 161 200
No. of Characters: 792 1000
No. of Different Words: 96 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.562 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.919 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.544 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 47 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.854 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.53 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.798 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.189 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...choice for Book Club Members at 33.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18633540373 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61312844323 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590062111801 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7084448914 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0317684975354 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0180755629087 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0123868855436 0.0843802449381 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0211508170075 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132091725089 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.