The table charts given information of attendance in secondary school by pupils in three years
The tabular chart Illustrates the information about that the percentage of children attendance in four different secondary school in the three years 2000, 2005 and 2009.
A quick look on graph is enough to make it clear that the number of childrens were more prefer to went to voluntary school from the starting year, however, in the end years pupils had more liked to community school.
To commence with, in 2000, about 52% of children attending the voluntary school, which was the highest than that others three schools and which was followed by grammar schools where approximately one quater attendance by pupils. While, specialist and community the figure had showed to remained stable and just at 12% of children attended the school in 2000.
However, in 2009, among four schools while only one of the community school which was showed to drastic changed and the percentage of children attendance had increased to 58%. In contrast, among three schools(specialist, grammar and voluntary school) in 2009 the proportion of school attendance was fall down to 10%, 12%, 20%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-30 | Har preet singh | 78 | view |
- The bar chart show to the population in the U.K and the percentage of aged 60 and over in 1985 and makes a estimated for 2035. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who are five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 73
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 84
- It is suggested that all the young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community. Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the community and the young people. 56
- Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development, however, others thinks social value is lost as a result. Do you think advantages of economics development outweigh the disadvantages. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1581920904 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77118500089 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553672316384 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.1645727982 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.166666667 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333521717533 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182530473297 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928018029505 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225641482936 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873926520262 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.