The table chart given the information that Australia family spend the monthly income on household products in two years.
The tabular chart illustrates the information about that the compare of how many Australia family like to monthly income spend on six different household items from 1991 to 2001.
A quick look on graph is enough to make it clear that the household product of food more popular in Australian family more than monthly income spend on this item as compared to others products.
To commence with, in 1991, the people of Australia not more prefer monthly wages on transport and clothing at, $70 and $30. While, after a decade ago the figure had one time decreased just at $45 and $20, respectively.
However, among three household products as food, electricity and water and housing and represented to climbed and the number of Australia families had more fascinated the spend the monthly income on this three products and reached at(160, 120 and 100 dollars), whereas the figure for electricity and water had dramatically changed. Finally, others good services in native of Australian more statistical expenditure a monthly income on this item from $250 in 1991 and $270 in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-30 | Har preet singh | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information about a restaurants average sales in three different branches in 2016 53
- Some people think that a programmer of international exchange visit would benefit all teenager school students. Do you think the benefits of such a programmer would outweigh any disadvantages. 11
- The table charts given information of attendance in secondary school by pupils in three years 78
- Scientist predict that all people will choose to talk the same language in the future. Do you think is a positive and negative development. 61
- It is now possible for scientist and tourist to travel to remote natural environment, such as south pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... Australia families had more fascinated the spend the monthly income on this three produc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94972067039 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67801207932 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586592178771 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.7783606667 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.666666667 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31309837532 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148950545419 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107634369835 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198338707718 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948171491576 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.