The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010, 2012 and 2014.
The table shows datum about the registration of five kinds of vehicles in Australia in 2010, 2012 and 2004. The number of all registered vehicles increased, especially, the significant growth of motorcycle and light trucks. Overall, the figure of passenger vehicles was the highest and the light trucks was the lowest.
Obviously, passenger and commercial vehicles accounted for a vast majority number of the five-type throughout the years. The former’s registered rate changed for 10.2% , which started at 11.8 million in 2010, then rose up to 12.7 million in 2012 and reached a peak at 13 million in 2014. The latter registered number had higher proportion change with 17.4% that began with 2.3 million in 2010, grew by 0.3 million in 2012 and 0.4 in two years later.
The three left types of vehicles represented a smaller number compare to passenger and commercial vehicles. In spite of small registered number, motorcycles showed a top increase of 30.8%, from 0.54 million in 2010 to 0.709 million in 2014. Vehicle with the second highest rise rate was light trucks with 23.5%, that rose by 0.025 million from 2010 to 2014. Heavy trucks got a minimal rise of 8.3% and increased by 0.032 million in four years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-20 | ngtlinh | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that personal happiness is directly related to economic success while others argue that happiness depends on other factors Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 73
- A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo Japan listened to music over the previous month The pie chart shows a record company s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music Summarize the information by selecting and 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rmer’s registered rate changed for 10.2% , which started at 11.8 million in 2010, ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...in 2012 and 0.4 in two years later. The three left types of vehicles represente...
^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er, motorcycles showed a top increase of 30.8%, from 0.54 million in 2010 to 0.70...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57369662872 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.358233377 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296938630496 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123434787765 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104330099569 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21314665962 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642909374603 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.