The table gives information on consumer on different items in five different countries in 2002.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table chat depicts above which countries more consuming various types of items food, drinks, tobacco, clothing and footwear and also education in 2002
Overall it can be manifested, more consuming food, drinks, and tobacco in the country was turkey and second-highest Ireland and Italy had more wear clothing, footwear, Person had less used education in Spanish.
Initially, increase the amount of consuming drinks, tobacco, food had turkey 32.14 percent and Ireland had second-highest 28.9 percent. In 2002 Turkey and Ireland had people prefer clothes and footwear mostly the same percentage. In had the turkey community high range focus on an education 4.35 percent as contrary other countries.
However, the people less consuming food, drinks, tobacco in Sweden 15.77 percent and slightly increased to one percent. In Italy prefer 16.36 percent consuming. In Italy, the people hiegst amount of wear clothes and footwear to 9 percent as contrast Sweden only 5.40 percent. Italy and Sweden were spending time on leisure education between 3.20 percent to 3.22percent and Spain had the third-highest consuming food, drinks, tobacco 18.80 percent was consumer time spending wear clothes and footwear 6.5percent in 2002 and less consuming time education only 1.98 percent as compared to Turkey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanabi | 11 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanabi | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | KayVu | 84 | view |
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television fridge do disadvantage of this development for society of outweigh 74
- The table gives information on consumer on different items in five different countries in 2002 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the consumption and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979and 2004 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... between 3.20 percent to 3.22percent and Spain had the third-highest consuming fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.495 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60168695273 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 108.437121757 43.030603864 252% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 137.375 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0661964523872 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291074501251 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313678467079 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597478370194 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433356969564 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.