The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainme
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table gives information about the percentage of family income that five European nations paid each month for four various categories.
Overall, it is clear that all five countries use most of their household earnings for food and beverage and housing, while clothing and entertainment have lower expenses.
The expenditure on food and beverages is highest in Turkey and Spain, constituting more than a third of their income, at 36% and 31%, respectively. Regarding that in France, Germany, and the UK, they just allocated approximately a quarter of their revenues for eating. However, the trend is inverted in housing with the spending on it being two-thirds compared to food and drinks in Turkey and Spain, while the three others spend more, around 33% of the income on housing.
Coming to the remaining two items, which are spent fewer household revenues for by five European countries. The number of expenses that citizens in Germany, the UK, and Turkey use for purchasing clothing range from 11% to 15%, whereas France and Spain are roughly half as much as this amount, 7% and 8%, respectively. For the entertainment sector, 19% is the highest proportion, which is paid for by German income. In the four other nations, on average around 13% of family earnings are used for that, with a mean difference of not more than 3%.
- The table describes the changes of people in millions who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 78
- Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment Do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 84
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
- The chart below shows the percentage of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99103139013 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69824022498 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587443946188 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7509708811 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154331302643 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643699171822 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064858627308 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110437641574 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462481288654 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.