The table provides statistics about Irish Italian Spanish Swedish and Turkish consumer expenditures on the various items in the year of 2002

Essay topics:

The table provides statistics about Irish, Italian, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish consumer expenditures on the various items in the year of 2002

The table provides statistics about Irish, Italian, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish consumer expenditures on the various items in the year of 2002.

Overall, outfits, pleasure and education take significant parts of their lifestyles yet, refreshments become the greatest needs for the all countries.

According to food, drink and tobacco column on the table, Ireland and Turkey made up the most highest trends (28.91% and 32.14%) while Italy and Sweden had fewer percentage, at 16,36% and 15,77% respectively. The number of Spanish spending was 18.80% at that time.

Looking at the second column of the table, Italy accounted for 9% of outfit expenditure when Sweden rated the lowest trend (5.40%).In the meantime, the other three countries underwent nearly the same amounts (6.43%, 6.51% and 6.63%). In the last column, while Turkey was again the top nation showing 4.35 percent, the Spanish spending was the fewest one (1.98%).The percentage of spending for these items in Ireland was 2.21% while Italy and Sweden experienced almost the same amount ( 3.20% and 3.22%).

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-11 feya 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...e table, Ireland and Turkey made up the most highest trends 28.91% and 32.14% while Italy an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the highest'.
Suggestion: most the highest
...e table, Ireland and Turkey made up the most highest trends 28.91% and 32.14% while Italy an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...hen Sweden rated the lowest trend 5.40%.In the meantime, the other three countries...
^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...anish spending was the fewest one 1.98%.The percentage of spending for these items ...
^^^
Line 7, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...weden experienced almost the same amount 3.20% and 3.22%.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34523809524 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47295461648 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660714285714 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.2676513601 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.666666667 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25080968889 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185771380665 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.364598438779 0.0843802449381 432% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266654518494 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.423698937815 0.0819641961636 517% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.