The table shows the amount of money donated in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.
Displayed in the table is the number of money from charities which is spent on technology to developing countries by The US, EU countries and other countries between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, the trending of money was invested for the help of technology by The US increased according to the time whereas EU countries and other countries saw a growth in the first 3 years and fluctuation at the end of the period. Units were measured in billions of US dollars.
The governments were expenditure on the aid of technology with 15,7 at the beginning of the period before climbing to 16,8 in 2007 and 20,4 in 2008. Afterwards, the year 2009 experienced a significant increase by 3,9, just as the figure for money donated in aid of technology peak at precisely 30 in the final of the period. In particular, the amount of money by The US started at 9,7, then grew to 10,5, and soared remarkably to 18 in 2009. Subsequently, 22,7 was the figure for money expenditure on the help of the technology in 2010, which was the highest number by The US over the period given.
With regards to EU countries and other countries, they spent 3,3 and 2,7 on aid of technological development in 2006, then, the year 2008 witnessed a slight growth in EU countries and other countries (3,8 and 3,1 respectively). While money for the aid of technology by The US climbed dramatically in 2009, there was a decline in the figure for EU countries and other countries with 3,7 and 2,6 in order. In 2010, the governments in other countries donated 3,3 to help technology of developing countries, which was lower than EU countries with 4.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | wardiati | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | oxfordpro111 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | JennieD | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 73
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010. 78
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The information below gives detail about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2011 and 2013. 67
- In the modern world It is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66549295775 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84434475127 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433098591549 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2801153539 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560669099164 0.215688989381 260% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244298018567 0.103423049105 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182288757878 0.0843802449381 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.394953312413 0.15604864568 253% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192137793274 0.0819641961636 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.