The table shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS Academic Paper in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table displayed the average band scores of students from four different nationalities taking the IELTS Academic Exam in 2010.
Overall, both the overall and skills band scores of Romanian test takers were the highest, while Italy was the country that had the lowest overall band scores. Furthermore, the Romanians also achieved the highest marks in reading and listening skills, whereas Italian students had the lowest score in writing.
Looking at the table more closely, it was noticeable that Romanian test takers achieved the highest score in almost every skill, scoring 7.1, 7.2, 6.2, and 6.8 in listening, reading, writing, and speaking respectively. This was followed by the Kannada, which achieved a 6.7 overall score, with the same speaking score as Romanian test takers and a 7.0 reading score. This reading score was also similar to what Malaysian students scored.
The second-highest reading score was obtained by the Italian, with a 7.0 mark. However, they also had the lowest marks in other sections, scoring 6.4 in reading, 5.8 in writing, and 6.3 in speaking.
- The following diagrams show how goods were transported in a European country in three different periods 66
- The table shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS Academic Paper in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the stages a company should go through before launching a product globally Summarise the information and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23563218391 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52884665378 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.096307952 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169567706749 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976550849195 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114039047909 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151441000757 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142864949828 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.