The table shows the change in the number of cinemas in different regions in a European country between 2004 and 2009.
The table data provides information on the alterations in the number of cinemas in different areas in an unknown European country during period 2004-2009.
Overall, the period witnessed upward trends in city centers and areas nearby, consistent with the growth of total number. However, they were contrary to the downward trends in the suburbs and countryside that bucked the trend.
In particular, figures for city centers constantly constituted the highest numbers in both years, increasing slightly by 3.1% from the starting point of 1,512 to 1,620. Similarly, a growth of 1.6% (300-400 cinemas) was recorded in areas close to city centers. Correspondingly, these numbers were approximately one-fifth and one-fourth in comparison with those in city center areas.
However, regarding the suburb and countryside, the table shows opposing trends, with number decreasing by 25% from 40-30 for the former and by 6% from 108-90 for the latter. These figures were consecutively among the lowest across the table. Besides, it is noticeable that the most remarkable change was found in suburban areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-19 | maiphuong0610 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | maiphuong0610 | 74 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | maiphuong0610 | 89 | view |
- Today food travels from thousands of miles from the farm to the consumer Some people say that it would be better for the economy environment if people ate food produced from local farmers Why is this the case Is it a positive development 84
- The two plans below show the Pancha village in 2005 and 2015 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Music has been and will continue to be the universal language of mankind To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The map shows the change of Bell Hill from a farm in 1976 to an Environmental Study Centre in 2006 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45294117647 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83190546829 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7701855298 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215385502973 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777705339732 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11530268249 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146253828391 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14595468927 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.