The provided table depicts information of cell phones sold in millions from 2006 to 2012 from five developers. It is obvious from provided data, that number of mobile phones sold showed an increasing trend, however cross developers some had decrease in sells when others had opposite effect.
At the beginning of the period in 2006 only Nokia, Ericsson, Samsung and Motorola have been selling cell phones, when Nokia and Motorola were leaders with 345 and 210 millions of mobile phones sold. Over the period Nokia had almost same sells with slightly increase. Ericsson with 74 millions of cell phones sold in 2006 ended up in 2012 with only 28 millions of cell phones sold, despite of increase in sales in 2007 from 74 millions year before to 102 millions. Motorola was second biggest producer of cell phones in 2006 with sells of 210 millions of mobiles, however, in next years experienced significant dropped in sales to 28 millions in 2012, same as Ericsson.
In 2007 Apple have entered market with cell phones with 2.3 millions of mobile phones sold. Over the half decade Apple's sales rapidly growth to 135.8 millions of mobile phones sold. Samsung have sold in 2012 more than three times more cell phones than in 2006 (396.5 millions, 117 millions).
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Internet has become major source of information for students.Do you think in the near future intenet will replace the need of books?Discuss your opinion giving reasons and examples. 61
- The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. 73
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women . To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many animal species are becoming extinct as a result of human activities.what are the causes and possible solutions to this problem? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '210 million'.
Suggestion: 210 million
... and Motorola were leaders with 345 and 210 millions of mobile phones sold. Over the period Nok...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '74 million'.
Suggestion: 74 million
...s with slightly increase. Ericsson with 74 millions of cell phones sold in 2006 ended up in 20...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '28 million'.
Suggestion: 28 million
...sold in 2006 ended up in 2012 with only 28 millions of cell phones sold, despite of increase i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 539, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '210 million'.
Suggestion: 210 million
...er of cell phones in 2006 with sells of 210 millions of mobiles, however, in next years experie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
... entered market with cell phones with 2.3 millions of mobile phones sold. Over the half decad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...cade Apples sales rapidly growth to 135.8 millions of mobile phones sold. Samsung have sold i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89201877934 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24296235287 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511737089202 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1536192416 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209859046519 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109228765974 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443540813609 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161099687338 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181555343324 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.