The table compares the proportion of people using different types of phone functions in three consecutive years.
It is noticeable that the phones main feature was calling someone.usage of some function increased significantly.search the internet was the most dramatic change over the period.
First of all,making call was the most popular feature and overall 100 percent people use it.although,in 2006 it declined by 1 percent and reached 99 percent.text photos and send and receive text messages increased gradually.play games fluctuate over the period.in 2006 start with 17 percent,then 42 in 2008.in 2010,it decrease 1 percent that was 41 percent.
Search the internet witnessed massive increase throughout the period.in 2006,no data shown about internet usage.in 2008,it reached about 41 percent of mobile users.Also in 2010,it reached nearly doubled than 2008. 73 percent mobile users search in the internet.play music also increase gradually.in 2006,12 percent phone users play music on their phone,whereas 18 and 26 percent in 2008 and 2010 respectively.record video went up moderately over the period.no data shown in 2006 about record video,compared to 9 and 35 percent in 2008 and 2010.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 56
- The table shows the percentage of people with mobile phones who use various features on their phone Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
- The graph shows the average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone services 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , making
... change over the period. First of all,making call was the most popular feature and o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...erall 100 percent people use it.although,in 2006 it declined by 1 percent and reach...
^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , then
...the period.in 2006 start with 17 percent,then 42 in 2008.in 2010,it decrease 1 percen...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
...h 17 percent,then 42 in 2008.in 2010,it decrease 1 percent that was 41 percent. Searc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...eached about 41 percent of mobile users.Also in 2010,it reached nearly doubled than ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , whereas
...nt phone users play music on their phone,whereas 18 and 26 percent in 2008 and 2010 resp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 498, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , compared
...no data shown in 2006 about record video,compared to 9 and 35 percent in 2008 and 2010. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63186813187 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2620939739 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631868131868 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.4402509733 43.030603864 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 205.0 112.824112599 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.4 22.9334400587 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106119920232 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803376312709 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533902574964 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922825919155 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498613532365 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.3 13.2329268293 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 61.2550243902 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.97 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.