The figures reveal the percentage of student attendees in four categories of secondary school from 2000 until 2009. It is clearly seen that there was a decrease in the pupil attandance for all school types except for community school.
In 2000, voluntary-controlled schools had the highest percentage of students with 52%, while grammar schools had 24%, more than a half difference from the first type. After 5 years, the first school category declined by 12% and this continued until 2009 where it reached only 20%. The vocabulary schools also plummeted over the years and only 12% of the students attended at the last period. Subsequently, specialist schools followed the same pattern with 12% at the beginning and fell down 1% every 5 years.
Community schools however, started with one of the least preferred institutions with just over a tenth but as the years went by a huge increase was observed. It grew almost 2 folds by 2005 and rocketed after 5 years with 58% quadrupling its percentage on the first period.
- Comparison of car theft 84
- The bar chart shows British Emigration selected to destinations between 2004 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 11
- Consumption of Fast Food by Australian teenagers 11
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly seen that there was a decrease in the pupil attandance for all school types ex...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01754385965 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8084182665 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643274853801 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.5726608634 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223487465259 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983553841934 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761694430877 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158675971745 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111588002139 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.