The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between 2000 and 2009
The table illustrates the percentage of pupils attending 4 different types of secondary schools from 2000 to 2009, in a duration of 10 years.
Overall, as it can be seen the proportion of voluntary-controlled, specialist and grammar schools decreased, while the community schools increased during the same period.
As is given in the table, community schools shot-up from just over 10% in 2000 to a little less than 60% in 2009. while the percentage of 3 other pupils schools, declined by 2%, 12%, and 32% respectively. However, specialist schools fell insensibly but voluntary-controlled schools have a significant downfall. Finally, grammar schools became half in these years from nearly one quarter to almost 10 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-15 | reverjae | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Chyka | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentages of books, by type, that were borrowed over this time. 78
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia. 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 84
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...2000 to a little less than 60% in 2009. while the percentage of 3 other pupils school...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 612.0 965.302439024 63% => OK
No of words: 114.0 196.424390244 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36842105263 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.26757987692 3.73543355544 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45311114912 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.684210526316 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 172.8 283.868780488 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8128667267 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299618476304 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140547375374 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13245839016 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229152306048 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142516648133 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.