The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables describe sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas from 1999 till 2004 in UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden. Overall, the coffee sales presented a rise in the five countries, especially the UK, while the banana sales also increased in the majority of sampled places except Sweden and Denmark.
In the first table, the sale of coffee increased over the period of five years in the five European countries. The coffee sales in the United Kingdom experienced the most dramatic increase, from 1.5 million euros in 1999 to 20 million euros in 2004, a more than tenfold rise. Meanwhile, the coffee sales in Switzerland were doubled from 3 million euros to 6 million euros. Also, the coffee sales in both Denmark and Sweden increased by the same amount of euros, from 1.8 to 2.0 million euros and from0.8 to 1.0 million euros respectively.
However, from the second table, the whole sales of bananas in the five countries showed a different pattern in the five years. The five years witnessed the most significant rise in banana sales in Switzerland, from 15 to 47 million euros. United Kingdom and Belgium had a similar increase, ranging from 1 to 5.5 million euros and from 0.6 to 4 million euros respectively. Nonetheless, the sales of bananas in the rest two countries declined—from 1.8 to 1 million euros in Sweden and from 2 to 0.9 million euros in Denmark.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people’s reading and writing skills. Does the advantage outweigh the disadvantage? 78
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 84
- Many people believe that the main aim of university education is to help graduates find better jobs, while some people believe that a university education has wider benefits for individuals and society as a whole. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91914893617 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79082114472 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446808510638 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6167240659 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230252592718 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130461264356 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868144422446 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19614411293 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814320187954 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.