In many countries, there are more people choosing to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative to the development of society?
It is being discussed why a rising number of people choose to live on their own nowadays, such living in another house in a city and living in a distinct city. This article will provide contributing factors to this trend, then followed by my own opinion towards it.
The reason for people living in a different houses in a city is that they own different interests. For example, modern people have easy access to a variety of information on the Internet, which may stimulate their interests in distinct things. In order to better develop these hobbies, they may decide to live alone, rendering themselves a greater freedom to do what they want. In addition, by virtue of seeking better education, current young people in growing numbers have to leave their family and live by themselves in a different city. For example, if the students from the less developed countries, where education is conceivably in low quality, want to seek advanced education, they are forced to leave for the developed states, where there are plenty of prestigious universities, such as Cambridge University in London of Britain. This also contributes to the alone-living trend.
From my perspective, however, this change may bring about both positive and negative impacts to the social development. On the one hand, people are more likely to cultivate their independence. This is because living alone means that the people are required to take care of themselves, which may help them accumulate plenty of independent skills in the society. Obviously, independent citizens may reduce the burden of the government for they may be less likely to rely on the society when they run into difficulties in life. On the other hand, the relationship between family members can be undermined by this situation. In general, living independently may definitely cause family to communicate less frequently because they are not usually staying together, and then to have less knowledge of one another. In the end, family members may suffer less close family bonds.
In short, two reasons result in the phenomenon of more people living by themselves, which may bring pros and cons to the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | oceanyang | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-26 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-29 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 84
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- In many countries, there are more people choosing to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative to the development of society? 73
- It is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reserve the trend? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...followed by my own opinion towards it. The reason for people living in a diffe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'house'?
Suggestion: house
...reason for people living in a different houses in a city is that they own different in...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...contributes to the alone-living trend. From my perspective, however, this c...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...may suffer less close family bonds. In short, two reasons result in the phen...
^^^^
Line 7, column 5, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...suffer less close family bonds. In short, two reasons result in the phenom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in addition, in general, in short, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12112676056 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79700012167 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529577464789 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.577902391 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241169516423 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797784082857 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437939878727 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14688172837 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238513682041 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.