The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables provide information about how much money was earned by Fair-trade bananas and coffee in 5 countries over a 5-year period.
Overall, the most striking feature is coffee revenues increased in all 5 nations, with the UK having the most dramatic climb over the period. In comparison, sales for bananas also increased to varying degrees in 3 countries while the reversed was true for Sweden and Denmark.
Looking at sales of coffee between 1999 and 2004 , the figure for the UK shot up from 1.5 million to 20 million pounds. A less pronounced increase was witnessed in the figure for Switzerland, which doubled to reach 6 million pounds in 2004. In comparison, coffee revenues in Belgium rose by only 0.7 million pounds, which more than tripled the increase in the figures for Denmark and Sweden.
Turning to the revenue of bananas in the same period, the figure for Switzerland climbed remarkably to reach 47 million euros. In addition, there were comparable increases in the figures for the UK and Belgium (by almost 6 times to hit 5.5 million euros and by around 7 times to reach 4 million euros, respectively). By contrast, banana sales in both Sweden and Denmark experienced noticeable reductions (by 0.8 million euros and 1.1 million euros).
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person in an Australian university 74
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whe 61
- Should students be allowed to choose which classes they take, or should they be required to take the same classes as everyone else?What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to education?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevan 89
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 74
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at lea 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at sales of coffee between 1999 and 2004 , the figure for the UK shot up from 1.5 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00947867299 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6511406292 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.7377872851 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.444444444 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133550883406 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663714019049 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559693356636 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989550940727 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542573539109 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.