The tables below provide information about the consumption and production of potatoes in five parts of the world in 2006.
The tables provide information about potatoes consumption and production in five different continents in the world in 2006 in kg per person. Overall, it is clear that Europe was potato’s biggest consumer, while the lowest consumption was in Africa. Otherwise, Asia was the highest producer of potatoes.
Out of the five parts of the world, each person’s consumption of potatoes was noticeably higher in Europe at 96.1 kg, while Europe only produced 126.3 kg per person. In contrast, Asian people per person just consume 25.8 kg but had the biggest producer of potatoes at 131.2 kg per person.
On the other hand, South and Central America and North America had the same problem, they could produce as much as 15.6 kg and 24.7 kg of potatoes respectively, however, each person in those continents needed 23.6 kg and 57.9 kg for consuming potatoes. The region consuming the least potatoes was Africa with 14.1 kg. Nevertheless, African people could produce 16.4 kg of potatoes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2023-01-07 | ieltsmaster | 73 | view |
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The tables below provide information about the consumption and production of potatoes in five parts of the world in 2006 73
- Some people think young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc to serve society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06172839506 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69404668058 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2690733832 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206955329382 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118514775384 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188679453054 0.0843802449381 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176957124423 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151460809768 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06172839506 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69404668058 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2690733832 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206955329382 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118514775384 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188679453054 0.0843802449381 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176957124423 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151460809768 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.