The tables give information about the average hours work by part time and full time men and women in three countries in Europe in 2002 and compare them with the European countries

Essay topics:

The tables give information about the average hours work by part-time and full-time men and women in three countries in Europe in 2002 and compare them with the European countries.

The table below depicts the comparison between three European countries, namely Greece, the Netherlands, the U.K. and the middle of Europe's workers, in terms of the data about the average number of hours for full-time and part-time employees in 2002. Overall, it is noticeable that men worked longer than women, both full-time and part-time, in Greece and the UK, while the Netherlands witnessed an equal amount for both genders. 

For permanent work, Greek males and females labored the longest full-time hours, with 42,5 for men and 39,9 for women. Male and female full-time workers from the Netherlands contributed the same number of hours, at 38 each. By contrast, UK male full-time employees only worked 37,5 hours a week and females worked an average of 37 hours per week, which was the lowest figures in full-time work. The average European male full-time worker puts in approximately 40 hours a week, compared to more than 1 hour for a female.

For a brief work, Greek was again at the top of the table, at 30 hours for men and 29.3 hours for women, respectively. Women in the Netherlands worked 29.2 hours per week in part-time jobs, more than an hour longer than men in this nation. Similar to a full-time job, UK women worked the fewest hours, at 28 per week, while UK men worked 29 hours per week, an hour more than men who labored temporarily in the Netherlands. Additionally, the European average was higher than any of the individual countries, recording figures of 34 for women and 32 for men. Finally, the average male temporarily working hours are less than 2 hours for a female.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-07 DEEP PANCHAL 67 view
2022-09-13 linhdk35 73 view
2021-11-18 adamneyul 74 view
2020-02-15 Nguyen Manh Dung 84 view
Essays by user adamneyul :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nessed an equal amount for both genders.  For permanent work, Greek males and fema...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91176470588 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77212708607 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477941176471 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6445732715 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.6 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372982756721 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184826128037 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771707804161 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303051387105 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606345713768 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.