Task 1: The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group
The table gives the statistics about the number of people in New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group.
Overall, the population of New Zealand rose slowly between 2011 and 2012, the number of people from 15 to 39 was the highest in two years. Besides, while the population of groups of people under 15 and 15- 39 followed a downward trend, the opposite was true for the group of 40- 64 and above 65.
It is substantial that the population of people from 15-19 ranked first with 1547102 people in 2012, after falling slightly by 0,2 percent in a year. With 1577256 people, they were also the largest group in 2011. Turning to the 40-64 group, the figure for it escalated by 0,6%, with the start from 1332907 in 2011 to 1339898 in 2012.
Regarding the group under 15, they showed the same pattern with the largest group when decreasing by 0,2%. The smallest group, people above 65, rocketed the most sharply by 4,0 percent from 573946 to 596903. Moreover, the population of New Zealand went up by 29015 people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | minhnhat2002 | 61 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | kevann | 70 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | kevann | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Giang Tran | view |
- Task 2 There have been many inventions in the human history such as the wheel Some people think the most important thing is the internet To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Task 1 The plans below show how the ground of a particular building has changed over time Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of first year students who gave very good rating to the resources provided by the college for three courses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 73
- Task 1 The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers Summarise the information b 78
- Task 1 The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, moreover, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58241758242 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21536935282 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554945054945 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7700068199 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376484095677 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174453356009 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12547933735 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278712044804 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130210273155 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.