Task 2: Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, undeveloped countries are given financial aid from developed countries, which can not let them get over poverty. Consequently, it is advisable that wealthy nations support them in other methods. I concur with this point of view as there are many more reasonable approaches to help poor countries.
It is obvious that encouraging enterprises to invest in poor countries’ economies is superior to pouring money into them for many reasons. First, if investors run businesses, they will need to employ laborers so that the poor can have jobs to enhance the standard of life. Hence, the consumption rises, which facilitates the development of manufacturing products, a key to the growth of the economy. The second merit is that nations have significant fundings which root in profits foreign businessmen make. That will lay a foundation for governments to organize campaigns, implement plans in order to get out of poverty.
It is also believed that economic powerhouses should focus more on educational aid than financial aid. Firstly, when students from poor countries have scholarships to study abroad, they can easily access modern technology, academic knowledge. Because of that, after many years of studying, they can create innovations in every aspect and that entails the positive development of society. Moreover, these international students can educate people in their countries and more and more people are qualified enough to get well-paid jobs. New generation with more qualifications can ameliorate the quality and quantity of products.
In conclusion, helping poor countries in fields such as education, economy is more beneficial, compared with financial aid.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- Task 1 The table below shows water use for different purposes in four countries The use of water by four different countries 73
- Task 2 More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the Internet Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Task 1 The plan below shows a school in 1985 and the school now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Task 1 The charts below show the percentages of men and women aged 60 64 in employment in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 2 Many people believe that watching a live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or expe 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...neficial, compared with financial aid.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, so, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52895752896 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01138500488 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633204633205 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.644934955 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197979852819 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660190950003 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639279514045 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137716109694 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437653256404 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.