The three pie charts illustrate information about a school expenditure in the UK in three decades. As figure show, majority of expenses were dedicated to teachers’ salaries.
Spending money for salaries was totally 68% in the year 1981 and it was much more than other expenses. For example resources and furniture were only dedicated 15% of expenditures separately and insurance had the minimal role (2%) in the year 1981. In the years 1991 and 2001, salaries were advocated the most expenses as well as the year 1981. Also, resources and furniture altogether constitute 32% and 25% of expenses in the years 1991 and 2001 while insurance had overall the last place in all three years.
By comparing three decades, it is obvious that workers’ salaries had decreased but spending money for insurance increased. Furthermore, teachers’ salaries and furniture expenses soared in the year 1991 in contrast with the year 1981 and declined in the year 2001. Also, spending money for book sectors increased from the year 1981 to the year 1991 but it dramatically declined by the year 2001.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- You are unhappy about a plan to make you local airport bigger and increase number of flights. You live near the airport.Write a letter to your local newspaper. In your letter-explain where you live-describe the problem-give the reason why you do not want 78
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, well, while, as to, for example, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1061452514 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72434450733 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513966480447 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8203902532 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229339961256 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109732657115 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727869031105 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181477301555 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573589458671 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.