The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, 2001.
The given three circular charts depicts the information about the variations in the total expenditure, which was made in five different amounts by a particular UK school in the year: 1981, 1991 and 2001.
It can be seen that in the year of 1981, the maximum amount (40%) was used for giving salaries to the teachers however, it increased by 10% in the next decade and remains at the highest position. In addition, the expenditure made for furniture and equipments decreased to 5% in the year of 1991, which was 15% in the previous decade. Moreover, the least amount of money was utilised for insurance that was 2%, 3% and 8% in the year of 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively.
As far as trend was concerned, the other workers' salaries were more than a quarter in the year of 1991 but, it decreased by 6% in the next decade. Further, in the year of 2001, the money spent for giving salaries to other employees declined to 15% whereas, expenditure made for furniture and equipments inclined to 23%.
Overall, it is evident that the maximum amount of money was spent on teachers' salaries however, the money utilised for insurance was the mimimum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | Kalerbabal | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Kalerbabal | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 73
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantage of throwaway society outweigh any possible economics advantage? 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, 2001. 73
- The graph shows the demand for electricty in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie charts shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 78
- The bar chart below shows the result of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and show factor affecting 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71641791045 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60435287446 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487562189055 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.8946058523 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13354087971 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764968199992 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938695743215 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104192555375 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112609343761 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.