The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The given three circular charts highlight the information about variations in yearly expenditure of UK school in five different factors in three years: 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, it is evident that insurance and teachers salaries was gradually increased, while other workers salaries decreased, and rest were fluctuated.
It can be seen that expenditure of UK school for teachers salaries was 40℅ which was followed by 15℅ for furniture equipment and resources such as books. Apart from this, less than fifth had been spent by UK school on salaries of other workers. However, the amount which UK school had spent on these five factors in year of 1991 show some variations. It had been surged to 20℅ in resources, and for teachers salaries it had soared to half of the total per centum. Moreover, the remaining three factors: insurance, furniture equipment and other workers salaries, the spendings of UK school was 3℅, 5℅ and 22℅ respectively.
In the year 2001, US school had spent less than tenth for insurance, and 23℅ for furniture equipment. In addition to this, 9℅ was spent on resources. Along with this, the expenditure for salaries of teachers and workers again plunged to 45℅ and 15℅ respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing , including the process by which information is fed back to earlier to enable adjustment . 56
- The diagram below shows the light penetration under the ocean 82
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads? To what extent do u agree or disagree with the statement. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, apart from, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19402985075 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69176758513 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4594295073 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192436999648 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824910966919 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937413137207 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126371848385 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117094085971 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.