The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts describe how a particular UK school spent money every year in the three years of 1981, 1991, and 2001. Overall, expenditure on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment showed an upward trend during the three years while that on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books a downward trend and teachers’ payment always topped the charts.
There was an increase in the expenditure on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment in the twenty years. Two decades witnessed a significant rise in the spending on insurance, increasing from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001. Meanwhile, the amount of money on teachers’ salaries went up to 45% from 40%, with a peak at 50% in 1991. Also, the expense on furniture climbed to 23% from 15%, with a great dip at 5% in 1991. Although the money on teachers’ salaries was always far more than that on insurance, the latter reflected a greater growth rate.
However, the amount of money on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books experienced a decrease, which was more obvious in workers’ payment from 28% to 15%. The twenty years saw a drop in resources e.g. books from 15% to 9%, with a rise at 20% in 1991.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 11
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative development? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05333118707 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502415458937 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1622255198 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15373694316 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776569057339 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120984137168 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111976507993 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955213022198 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.