The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
Given are three pie charts illustrating the annual expenditure of a particular academic institution in Great Britain in different three years (1981, 1991 and 2001)
Overall, the spending of the salaries of teachers in 2001 remained the greatest of the total, followed by cost on furniture and equipment, despite a rapid reduction in 1991.
With regard to teachers’ salaries, the percentage of that contributed precisely 40% to 45% from 1981 to 2001 after reaching a peak in 1991, which accounted for 50%. At the same time, the proportion of furniture and equipment saw an 8% rise from 15% to 23% over the time, while it reached a low point at only 5% in 2001.
Meanwhile, the spending of other workers’ salaries and resources (e.g. books) were witnessed a deduction of 13% and 6% respectively in the period given. Notably, this school spent nearly triple money on insurance in 2001 (8%) compare to that in 1981 (2%).
To conclude, most of the money was spent on payment of salaries. In addition, school paid more and more money on insurance during 30 years given.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
2019-11-11 | Pamela K | 56 | view |
2019-09-19 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 78 | view |
2019-08-04 | Abimbola1 | 78 | view |
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 56
- the number of marriages and divorces 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are three pie charts illustrating the annua...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., if, so, while, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93406593407 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82556514337 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631868131868 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.1359057565 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.285714286 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188496318823 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714985658373 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783280623572 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104412269253 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843592121221 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.