Today’s parents spend too little time staying with their children and use television to make their children keep quiet. explain the reason and results by using your relevant examples.
In the present day, the majority of parents tend to exploit the television to retain their kids silent, without consuming their time with the children. The essay will elaborate the consequences for to this matter.
It is crystal apparent that currently technology is developing and humans are using technology for their daily works. Due to this the chemistry between parents and their children is witnessing a reverse trend. A plethora of parents are astonishingly busy and it can be witnessed that they are not spending their valuable time with their kids. It is indispensable for the kids to stay with their parents to educate themselves. However, we can see that kids are also preferred to monitor the television instead of staying with their parents. Consequently, kids won’t respect their parents eventually since the television can alter the mindset of a kid. Moreover, it is evident that there are number of television programs are telecasting at the moment and parents are also fond to watch these when they are free. For instance, in Sri Lanka it is apparent that parents are free during the night, and they tend to watch TV instead of enjoying their time with the kids.
Furthermore, there will be adverse consequences owing to this problem. Specially, children cannot become a part of a society in light of the fact that television is not capable of providing more general knowledge for the kids. Moreover, television can convert a decent kid in to a stubborn kid and eventually it will lead in to a dull future.
To sum up, parents are integral part of a children’s life. Due to this it is vital for the parents to stay with their kids and create a valuable child to the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-22 | Bhagya Diyagama | 76 | view |
- The current trend in education is to move away from traditional exams and instead have continuous assessment over the school year 73
- the graph below shows the number of university graduates in canada from 1992 to 2007 73
- Some people believe that to give opportunities to the new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire Do you agree or disagree 11
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 64
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 5.60731707317 606% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8724137931 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71694598429 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462068965517 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8155789561 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308243460157 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115823383775 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756623609268 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193773980162 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863301280558 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.