The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008.
The bar charts compare the difference in the comsumption of food and other items in three major European nations in the years 1998 and 2008.
It is clear from the given charts that there was a soar in the percentage of items bought in three nations over the period. While Norway inhabitants tended to buy food considerably higher, the other items appeared to be comsumed much more by Polland.
In 1998, about 15 per cent of food was bought in Norway. This figure tripled after a decade, to just below 45 per cent. Meanwhile, the percentages of food consumed by Polland residents and the British in the first stage were just around 8 per cent and 5 per cent, followed by a dramatic rise by approxinately 20 per cent, to 30 per cent and 25 per cent, respectively.
The consumption for other items was by far highest in Polland, where about 13 per cent was bought in 1998, then continued rising to 35 per cent in the final year surveyed. Norway and UK, on the other hand, had the smaller comsumption rates, where they witnessed an upward trend from only 7 per cent and 3 per cent in 1998 to 20 per cent and 18 per cent, respectively after 10 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Jagdeep sahota | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | Jagdeep sahota | 56 | view |
| 2017-02-11 | kingnight153 | 61 | view |
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 88
- Some people think that children need to study in an environment where they have to compete with each other. Others, however, believe that teamwork is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The table shows the maximum minimum and average monthly salaries in a European country in five employment sector in 2009 73
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...98, then continued rising to 35 per cent in the final year surveyed. Norway and U...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47393364929 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49292703558 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549763033175 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.114634146341 1745% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2153518032 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200652253656 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13281462778 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106845385388 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187881161256 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121588936207 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.