The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the 1980 and the 1990

Essay topics:

The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the 1980 and the 1990

The circular charts exhibit the information about the amount of energy produced by the five sources in the U.s.a during 1980 and 1990.

Overall, it can be incurred that the uses of alternative sources was increased but, U.s.a was totally depended on the non-renewable source as compared to the alternative source.

Primarily, it is vividly apparent that oil was the most used of source energy in both the decades. Despite, of experiencing the highest decrement of 9% in 1990 and the total production of 42% in 1980 and nearby thirty in 1990. Secondly to it, in 1980, was natural gas that produce the almost a quarter of the total production. But, during the next decades, it was fall down by 1%.

Continuing with the remaining source of energy, the consumption of hydroelectric power and nuclear power was 5% in 1980. However, in the former case it was constant and latter case it increased similarly growth accord in the coal it inclined 5% in 1990 as opposed to the 1980 it was 22%

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-24 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 78 view
2023-10-20 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 70 view
2023-08-27 cupinsiuway 11 view
2023-02-15 Wulan 78 view
2022-10-14 Hanabi 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: A_WAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...native sources was increased but, U.s.a was totally depended on the non-renewable s...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, secondly, similarly, so, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77325581395 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68488221016 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9321590893 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231930123766 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107700693457 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702080034934 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156827148729 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632175565369 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.