The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the change which occurred.

Essay topics:

The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the change which occurred.

The charts illustrate the information about the major source of energy production in USA from 1980s to 1990s.

In overall, oil constituted a main source of energy production; because, hydroelectric power produce least amount of energy. However, an increase can seen in coal and nuclear power.

It can seen from the information that oil can be observed more than a two fifth (42%) of the total percentage of energy production during 1980s in specific nation; whilst, it decreased a third (33%) in 1990s. In addition to this, proportion for produce energy by hydroelectric power remained constant one in twenty in both years.

The charts further prove that a rise of 5% can notice in energy production by nuclear power between 1980s (5%) and 1990s (10%) in particular country. Apart from that, the percentage of coal for produce energy was found 27% and 25% respectively in both years in USA . Lastly, there was difference of 1% can be seen in the proportion for energy production by natural gas during 1980s (26%) and 190s (25%) in given region.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-10 Kamal1993 67 view
2019-09-10 Kamal1993 67 view
Essays by user Kamal1993 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'produce the least'.
Suggestion: produce the least
...roduction; because, hydroelectric power produce least amount of energy. However, an increase ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...unt of energy. However, an increase can seen in coal and nuclear power. It can see...
^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...een in coal and nuclear power. It can seen from the information that oil can be ob...
^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1980s'.
Suggestion: during the 1980s
...e total percentage of energy production during 1980s in specific nation; whilst, it decrease...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...ation; whilst, it decreased a third 33% in 1990s. In addition to this, proportion for pr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd 25% respectively in both years in USA . Lastly, there was difference of 1% can ...
^^
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1980s'.
Suggestion: during the 1980s
...on for energy production by natural gas during 1980s 26% and 190s 25% in given region.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, so, third, apart from, in addition, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89772727273 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73522191465 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1048270678 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201744726922 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957844768331 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532758897764 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139576545788 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469245617865 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.