The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s
The pie charts illustrate the percentages of five energy products in the USA in two decades.
Overall, the quantity of oil, natural gas and coal were the largest during the 20-year timescale. Although the figure for oil witnessed a considerable decline at the end of the period, it was the main resource used for energy production during the 20-year timescale.
There was a significant drop in the quantity oil produced in the USA from 42 per cent to 33 per cent in the between the 1980s and the 1990s. Whereas, the opposite trend was experienced by the proportion of coal, which was 22 per cent at the beginning of the period then grew moderately by 5 percent, overtaking natural gas 20 years later.
In both years, the amount of hydroelectric power produced remained steady at 5 per cent. On the other hand, the figure for nuclear power production doubled to 10 per cent while natural gas accounted for one-fourth of energy production in the USA in the 20-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | bachduong123 | 11 | view |
| 2021-04-14 | Ngọc Ánh123 | view |
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. 89
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 84
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81065088757 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70160952458 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0194318508 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126531053167 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657419570073 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676367245362 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925008048296 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566617630775 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.