The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The two pictures compare the current layout of a town namely Denham with the same living place in the year of 1986.
It is clear that the today’s town involves a range of varieties to the main street across the town from north to south, predominantly on two sides of the street. There are no changes with respect to post office and bridge.
The most noticeable change from the old to the existing place is that there is no longer either garden or large building, which have been made into a retirement centre. In addition, there are a few streets added throughout the town instead of only one major street in the past. Notably, over the past few decades, there is a considerable increase in the number of houses built on both sides of the streets.
Another noticeable change is that farmland areas for feeding livestock or agricultural activities were entirely disappeared. When it comes to the primary school, the size of it was dramatically expanded, whereas the two shops in the north-west were torn down. Finally, the Denham town citizens have still remains two installations during the 23-year period, including the post office along with the northerly bridge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-01 | Delime | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Tuệ Nguyễn | 58 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | kamelelahe | 78 | view |
- In the modern world, it is possile to shop, work, and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with. Is it a positive or negative development in you opinion? 84
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from. 73
- The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50-year period. 78
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, still, whereas, as for, in addition, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93969849246 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62439561367 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603015075377 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7412377333 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158092318199 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594089275592 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447796995019 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101539206167 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378881869992 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.