The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrate the landscape of an island when it was still a wilderness and its changes after development.
It is readily apparent that there have been significant changes in the layout of the island over the given period. In addition, the island’s amenities was constructed on almost its scale except the eastern.
Before being developed, entire island was wilderness and did not have any facilities for living or recreation. However, it was not only surrounded by sea but also existed some forests. These forests were scatted near the western and in middle-east of the island.
After erecting facilities, it is easy to realize that the vast area from the center to the western which was pristine in the past have footpath and vehicle track now. Noticeably, it now have a pier used to be the first destination for tourists to get into the island. Reception surrounded by vehicle track is built at the center and link directly to the restaurant. Both the right and left of reception are houses for resting. Moreover, both forests and beach are still exist. Specially, the beach is now used for swimming. Furthermore, the east is still not changed.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian ciies 61
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...d vehicle track now. Noticeably, it now have a pier used to be the first destination...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69686657767 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7794797834 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8461538462 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0769230769 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119295527018 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381900207184 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402899827858 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843596012587 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351520239368 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.