The two maps show an island, before and after the renovation of visitor attraction.
At first glance, it is noticeable that there is a huge change after construction, especially the North part of the island. The reception for tourists to seek for informations is located in the middle of the island. Behind the reception, there is a built-up restaurant for visitors to dine in. In addition, the accommodation has divided into two parts, which are neither located at the South-West, and South-East of the reception.
As the map demonstrates, follow the vehicle track from the reception along to the South, there is a pier, as there will provide some activity, for example, hop on the yacht. In addition, there is only a short distance to walk to the swimming area, which is convenient for visitors who stay in accommodation nearby to the beach.
To sum up, the island after renovation is impressive and attractive, which would attract tourists to travel.
- It is said that people s life now is becoming more and more stressful What are the causes and how to solve it 72
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the expenditures of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. . Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, for example, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04375 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93948735964 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2584775679 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248480382778 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114673779319 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143542594572 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193818285019 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165051694015 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.