The maps illustrate the development of Paradise Island throughout the years.
Overall, it is clearly seen that there used to be some research on the island before it became a tourist destination. It is noticeable that the area had fewer trees for the construction of more buildings.
Since the island has become more habitable for the tourist. The whole area has been changed significantly. On the western side, the research station was converted to a hotel complex with a swimming pool on the top. Also, the traveler could swim in the beach at the northernmost part and the pier is redeveloped to be larger so that the cruise ship could be docked.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the island, the trees surrounding the island were replaced by an open restaurant, cycle path, and BBQ area, and scenic lookout and café are built near the rocks and the spring in the northeastern part.
- Nowadays more and more older people who are looking for work have to compete with younger people for the same jobs What problems does this cause What are some possible solutions 67
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 77
- The two maps below show the Paradise island in the past and in the present 61
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the process of making matches Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the process of making matches Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85620915033 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72189069688 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640522875817 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.3243952475 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.875 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120958183248 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567496670664 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806405476365 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986740647248 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908429909319 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.