The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The two rendered maps beneath exhibit the pre-construction and post-construction images for road access to a city hospital in the years 2007 and 2010.
Overall, it is explicit that the city hospital and the paths connecting the hospital has gone through a sea change, with the introduction of the new bus station.
To initiate with, it is apparent that, before in the year 2007 the hospital road was used as a bus stop; however, in 2010 a new bus station was constructed on the southwestern side of the map, which also connects with the ring road roundabout and city road roundabout. Moreover, another striking change is that earlier the car park for public and staff was the same, but in the year 2010, it got separated, with the staff car park on the southern side of the city hospital. Furthermore, a new public car park had erected on the eastern side of the hospital.
On further examination, from the post-development of the map, it was evident that a couple of roundabouts had been constructed to link the city road to ring road via the bus station. Finally, the whole city hospital had experienced significant modernization from the past.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 73
- For some people, consumer goods become the most important thing in life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage 11
- Some people think that it is vital to donate money in constructing to new railway line, while others believe that improving the existing one is better. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both 89
- The chart displays the quantity of oil production and consumption in million barrels per day in seven areas of the world in the year 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86868686869 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99681836524 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8971908305 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.714285714 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333139229534 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158633662436 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124181508741 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226027310564 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10904771679 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.