The illustrations provide information about the transformation which took place in a city hospital between 2007 and 2010.
In 2007 the area was less developed, having poor transportation system, but during the next 3 years it underwent a number of changes. The most noticeable is that the car park for the staff and the visitors was reconstructed to two different zones. While the public parking place was connected to Ring Road, the staff one was stayed at the same position near to Hospital Road.
Moreover, the new roundabouts were added to the both sides of Hospital Road. It has made more convenience transport connection between Ring Road and City Road.
In addition, there were several changes in the public infrastructure. The bus stops, which had been located to the left and the right sides of Hospital Road, were merged to one separate zone. Also, it was connected to a both new roundabouts.
Overall, a comparison of the two maps reveals a complete transformation of obstructed transport communication to a facilitated one. The separated parking zones made easier way to the hospital and the roundabouts forwarded the road connection. Finally, the replaced bus station made the visiting a hospital more comfortable.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06522429848 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0493376382 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186288543568 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671059218392 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506160613757 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113554033985 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493137569532 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.