The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps depict some of the development of a city hospital’s transportation infrastructure in the period between 2007 and 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable that three main modifications were made to the hospital’s vehicle access. There were new parking facilities, new roundabouts and the building of a new bus station.
Looking at the changes in more details, there were three bus stops on either side of Hospital Road in 2007. However, by 2010 they were no longer existent and was replaced by a new bus station on the west side of Hospital Road. Furthermore, the most striking change is the appearance of two new roundabouts. The first one was constructed at the three-way junction of Hospital Road and Ring Road, while the second one was located at the four-way intersection of Hospital Road and City Road.
Looking at the other features, new parking facilities that have been upgraded to two parking lots. In 2007, employees and customers utilized the same parking lot, which was situated to the east of Hospital Road and accessible through the Ring Road. On the other hand, a new public parking park was established on the eastern side of the city hospital, while the previous one belonged to staff only.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | Nyasha | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | lannkimm | 67 | view |
| 2020-09-16 | Dwarakesh Suresh | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-26 | sannacoconutandmango | 78 | view |
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 89
- Today TV channels broadcast men s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why is it the case Should TV channels give equal showtime for women s sport and men s sport 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
The two maps depict some of the development of a city hospital’s transp...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9512195122 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84455081928 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531707317073 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3815733628 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207630057667 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930722550168 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672194108961 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142396587662 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629012297319 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.