The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts depict data on domestic expenditure In Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
Overall, it is clear both Japanese and Malaysian nationals used the largest proportion of their housing allowance budget on three categories namely lodging, food, other goods and services. Moreover, healthcare and transport expenditures by the former were double that of the latter.
According to the charts, supplementary goods and services engulfed the largest ratio of costs for, the Japanese accounting for 29% of the total expenditure which was slightly higher than that of Malaysians, which was 26%. On the other hand, the highest percentage in Malaysia was spent on accommodation costs, 34% which was marginally higher compared to 21% in Japan for the same category. Provision of food in Jap and Malaysia was narrowly at par, 24% and 27% respectively.
The percentages for healthcare, other goods and services in Jap were 6% and 20% respectively, with each category double that in Malaysia, 3% and 6% respectively.
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 2006 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did physical activity in 2010 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3375 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98221289481 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8636359571 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103716615623 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660995955106 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930077386396 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968252734361 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112619371561 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.