The two maps below show roads to the city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show roads to the city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pictures show the layout of city hospital from the year 2007 and 2010
Overall, there are a few changes that are seen in the map of 2010. New areas have been constructed between 2007 and 2010.
Firstly, there are significant changes to the parking facility. Earlier, there was a single parking facility for staff and public, whereas in 2010, we can see that both have dedicated parking facility. A new parking facility was constructed to the east of the hospital which connects to the ring road. The facility that existed for parking in 2007 had been dedicated for staff car parking.
Secondly, there is a roundabout that has been constructed in the junction of City Road and Hospital Road. Similarly, there is another roundabout in between Hospital Road and Ring Road. A bus station is constructed to the west of Hospital Road, connecting both the roundabouts. The Bus station and staff car park is to the south of the Hospital.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-08 annaalysia007 84 view
2023-08-20 Daniel3003 78 view
2022-11-10 Nyasha view
2022-11-10 Nyasha 61 view
2022-11-10 Nyasha 78 view
Essays by user Dwarakesh Suresh :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83229813665 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58446301876 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459627329193 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8847628643 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190207498796 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859196627482 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756989505273 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146377774814 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676183696733 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.