The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world. Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The first image illustrates the major causes of the decline in the productivity of farming soil. Whilst, the second one depicts how these reasons impacted three areas of the world in the 1990s.
Overall, the pie chart shows that the major causes of land degradation worldwide were overgrazing followed by deforestation, over-cultivation, and other factors. The table brings out that Oceania was the most affected followed by Europe and North America.
According to the charts, overgrazing was accredited with an impact of 35% in the reduction of soil production around the world. This ratio was slightly above that of deforestation at 30% which was closely followed by over-cultivation which was responsible for 28% and other factors contributed a mere 7%.
In the second image, the data from the table clearly shows that Oceania had the highest percentage of agricultural land that lost fertility, 13% with the major contributor to this fact being overgrazing at 11. 3%. The second most affected was Europe at 23%, owing to a high rate of deforestation, 9. 8%. North America at 5% with over cultivation the leading contributor at 3. 3%.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 2006 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the process of using water to generate electricity Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Vehicle technology is advancing rapidly and cars that drive themselves have already been developed In the near future most people will use driverless cars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers Employers organizations say that in a global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent What are your views 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06125557538 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9265518567 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148615725851 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645104563667 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518496476713 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987597694621 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533307487215 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.