Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree
This century has been dogged by a wave of people moving from their native lands mainly due to humanitarian reasons. This phenomenon has seen an influx of immigrants in more developed states. While I believe that it is the ethical thing to do, I do not agree with the assertion that privileged nations ought to take in more refugees and also provide them with basics.
Firstly, leaders are elected by the society and as such should ensure the welfare of the electorate. Moreover, it is the duty of every country to take care of its own citizens. Owing to the fact that the national budget is made to take care of the citizens. For example, most recently a South African governor criticized the Zimbabwean government for failing to provide for its nationals who are now filtering down south. As a result of the hardship at home. However, this development was now adversely impacting on SA's budget. As a human being one could criticize her for not being a good Samaritan, on the contrary she was merely pointing out how the administration in Zimbabwe was failing its citizenry.
In addition, it should be noted that people are more comfortable in their native countries than in a foreign land where they get to experience a new culture. Owing to this, regional bodies such as EU and international organizations such as the UN need to observe and enforce the respect for human rights among member states.
In conclusion, I disagree with the view that wealthy societies should welcome more refugees and see to their upkeep, rather such humanitarian issues should be a burden for all countries to carry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | Nyasha | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Renu_art | 61 | view |
| 2021-02-27 | anoj adhikari | 33 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | Lien Huynh | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | NeutronnzZ | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 78
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...onals who are now filtering down south. As a result of the hardship at home. Howev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84363636364 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71695016182 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5635694568 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.461538462 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211373830937 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642744396588 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879514464553 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144536233624 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802088626546 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.